Reading Lolita in Tehran

I don’t think I’ve ever read a memoir quite like Reading Lolita in Tehran. Azar Nafisi’s book is part recollection of her hardships and those of her students while living in an Islamic “republic,” and part recollection of the novels they read together and the meanings of those novels — how they resonated for each of them. The author/teacher has come to see the two as inextricably linked. As her “magician” says, “You will not be able to write about Austen without writing about us, about this place where you rediscovered Austen. You will not be able to put us out of your head. Try, you’ll see.”

Nafisi divides her recollection across her experiences with four books: Lolita (Vladimir Nabokov), The Great Gatsby (F. Scott Fitzgerald), Daisy Miller (Henry James), and Pride and Prejudice (Jane Austen). When I began this book several months ago, I had not read Lolita, and in fact, picked it up because of this book (I had read all the others). I found several passages in the section about Gatsby that I intend to ask at least my Honors students to read. I actually came to have a new appreciation for Daisy Miller, which I didn’t remember liking very much when I read it in college.

Nafisi began a literature class for women out of her home after being fired from the University of Tehran for refusing to wear the veil. I found her accounts of teaching Gatsby in the university to be more interesting than her accounts of the secret literature class. To be honest, I found it difficult to keep up with all the characters. I’m not sure if this was due to the non-Western names or some other lack of mine or whether it was a failing of Nafisi’s. Perhaps other readers can comment with their thoughts on this.

In the Epilogue, Nafisi writes, “I left Tehran on June 24, 1997, for the green light that Gatsby once believed in.” It seems as if Nafisi’s characters have a love/hate relationship with the West. Many see it as a haven, while others revile it for its secularism and sinfulness, but most feel some sort of complex mixture of the two. In many ways, Nafisi’s relationship with Iran may be viewed the same way. She describes her homeland with sensuality one moment and disgust the next. Probably the most memorable passage recalled when Nafisi remarked to her husband that “living in the Islamic Republic is like having sex with a man you loathe… you make your mind blank — you pretend to be somewhere else, you tend to forget your body, you hate your body.” It seems that books helped Nafisi escape. Books are the “somewhere else” that Nafisi went went real life became too much.

I think this book should be required reading for anyone who loves literature, especially literature teachers. It is a passionate defense of reading for the sake of reading, but also for the impact that literature can have on one’s life.

Note: I’m aware that the review image looks wonky with the hover hyperlink. I’ve been playing with the CSS, but I can’t keep it from working on the review image unless I take it off the rest of the site, and frankly, that would involve lots of color changes, because you can’t tell the text is a link without an underline. I’ve asked for help, so hopefully I can fix it soon. I decided it would be the lesser of two evils to let the review look wonky until I can fix it rather than make the links too hard to find.

Related posts:

The Night Thoreau Spent in Jail

The Night Thoreau Spent in Jail : A Play
by Jerome Lawrence, Robert E. Lee

I am finishing up a unit on the Transcendentalists, and I thought this year, I would try The Night Thoreau Spent in Jail with one of my classes. We are getting ready to start studying it. I just finished it yesterday. I have to say that if you want a good introduction to Thoreau, this is perfect. I am wondering if my students will find it a little hard to follow, because it’s written in a stream-of-consciousness style as Thoreau spends his night in jail, thinking back on important life moments. I liked it, but it did take some getting used to. It was also a very quick read. Some of Thoreau’s lines in the play were taken directly from his writings.

I found I was very curious about how this was staged. If you have seen it performed, I’d love for you to describe it in the comments. It seems that it could be difficult to convey the notion that we are seeing inside Thoreau’s head on a stage. Movies have camera tricks and edits that accomplish the “dream sequence” type feeling, but I’m not sure how it would work on stage.

If you like Thoreau and the other Transcendentalists, you’ll probably like this play. Jerome Lawrence and Robert E. Lee also wrote Inherit the Wind, a play based on the Scopes Monkey Trial (and also my ex-husband’s favorite play).

Related posts:

Roswell Reads

Imagine hundreds of Roswell residents sharing the experience of reading and discussing a common book and you have the essence of “Roswell Reads.” Based on the “One Book…One City” community reading programs that have swept across the country, “Roswell Reads” hopes to include book discussions, author events and more. Our ultimate goal [is] to encourage residents of all ages and interests to read, read, and then read some more.

One of the things I like best about being a resident of Roswell is the diverse cultural offerings. We have great city recreation programs (still on my to-do list), lots of festivals, and now, the whole city is getting together for “Roswell Reads.” The idea is that Roswell residents will vote for a book to read, as a city, by November 30. After the winning book is announced, city residents will have three months to read the book. Various book discussions (probably at local bookstores and the library) will take place during that time. Finally, the program will culminate in a dinner and book discussion led by the author. Of course, book selection may be contingent upon the availability of the author.

Our choices are (taken verbatim from the City of Roswell website):

  • The Secret Life of Bees by Sue Monk Kidd: In The Secret Life of Bees, 14-year-old Lily Owen, neglected by her father and isolated on their Georgia peach farm, spends hours imagining a blissful infancy when she was loved and nurtured by her mother, Deborah, whom she barely remembers. These consoling fantasies are her heart’s answer to the family story that as a child, in unclear circumstances, Lily accidentally shot and killed her mother. The Secret Life of Bees is a carefully crafted novel with an inspired depiction of character.
  • The Kite Runner by Khaled Hosseini: In his debut novel, The Kite Runner, Khaled Hosseini accomplishes what very few contemporary writers are able to do. He manages to provide an educational and eye-opening account of a country’s personal turmoil — Afghanistan — while also developing characters whose heartbreaking struggles and emotional triumphs resonate with readers long after the last page has been turned over. An epic tale of fathers and sons, of friendship and betrayal, The Kite Runner takes us from the final days of Afghanistan’s monarchy to the atrocities of the present.
  • The Year the Lights Came On by Terry Kay: A must-read for anyone who grew up in Georgia during the 1940s or ’50s, especially those of us who remember the day the Rural Electrification Administration hooked us up and turned us on. Life changed dramatically, as Terry Kay depicts in his novel. The book is hilarious at times, tender and sad at others. Kay blends a bittersweet brew of young love, class consciousness and changing times.
  • Rocket Boys by Homer Hickam: Inspired by Werner Von Braun and his Cape Canaveral team, 14-year-old Homer Hickam decided in 1957 to build his own rockets. They were his ticket out of Coalwood, West Virginia, a mining town that everyone knew was dying — everyone except the mine superintendent, a man so dedicated that his family rarely saw him. Hickam grew up to be a NASA engineer and his memoir of the bumpy ride toward a gold medal at the National Science Fair in 1960 — an unprecedented honor for a miner’s kid — is rich in humor as well as warm sentiment. The portrait of his ultimately successful campaign to win his aloof father’s respect is equally affecting.
  • My Sister’s Keeper by Jodi Picoult: The difficult choices a family must make when a child is diagnosed with a serious disease are explored with pathos and understanding in this 11th novel by Picoult. The author turns her gaze on genetic planning, the prospect of creating babies for health purposes and the ethical and moral fallout that results. Picoult ably explores a complex subject with bravado and comes up with a heart-wrenching, unexpected plot twist at the book’s conclusion.
  • The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night- Time by Mark Haddon: Mark Haddon’s bitterly funny debut novel is a mystery of sorts — one told by an autistic version of Adrian Mole. Fifteen-year-old Christopher Boone is mathematically gifted and socially hopeless, raised in a working-class home by parents who barely cope with their child’s quirks. He takes everything that he sees (or is told) at face value, unable to sort out the strange behavior of his elders and peers. The result [is] original and genuinely moving.
  • All Over But the Shoutin’ by Rick Bragg: Pulitzer Prize winner Rick Bragg never forgets his roots. When he writes about death and violence in urban slums, Bragg draws on firsthand knowledge of how poverty deforms lives and on his personal belief in the dignity of poor people. His memoir of a hardscrabble Southern youth pays moving tribute to his indomitable mother and struggles to forgive his drunken father. All Over but the Shoutin’ is beautifully achieved on both these counts and many more.
  • The Color of Water by James McBride: James McBride grew up one of 12 siblings in the all-black housing projects of Red Hook, Brooklyn, the son of a black minister and a woman who would not admit she was white. The object of McBride’s constant embarrassment and continuous fear for her safety, his mother was an inspiring figure, who through sheer force of will saw her dozen children through graduate school. McBride was an adult before he discovered the truth about his mother: The daughter of a failed itinerant Orthodox rabbi in rural Virginia, she had run away to Harlem, married a black man, and founded an all-black Baptist church in her living room in Red Hook. In her son’s remarkable memoir, she tells in her own words the story of her past. Around her narrative, James McBride has written a powerful portrait of growing up, a meditation on race and identity, and a poignant, beautifully crafted hymn from a son to his mother.

I have to say that I am fairly impressed with the choices offered, and I intend to vote for The Kite Runner. I’ve heard great things about the book, and I think it would be interesting to read it like this. Even though I’ve read The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time, I must say that I would really like the opportunity to hear Mark Haddon speak! I am really looking forward to participating in this program, and I’ll read whichever book is chosen. I think this is an excellent idea. I went to the library today and saw a young teen filling out the ballot to vote for the book. As an English teacher, this just thrills me to no end. Actually, I think I’ll put all these books on my to-read list (with the exception of The Curious Incident, which I’ve read).

Related posts:

The Dante Club

Dan Brown wrote the book jacket blurb that appears on the cover of The Dante Club — “Matthew Pearl is the new shining star of literary fiction — a heady, inventive, and immensely gifted author. With intricate plots, classical themes, and erudite characters… what’s not to love?” But don’t let the fact that Dan Brown himself doesn’t really seem to know what these things are scare you away from the book. It’s an excellent read, paced just right, and the characters are really interesting. If Matthew Pearl hopes to get readers to check out Dante, then he succeeded. I had to check Inferno out of the library so I could check Pearl’s accuracy. He did not disappoint, and I don’t think the average reader will feel the lack if he/she doesn’t read Inferno. Pearl is so good at explaining the parts of Inferno alluded to that reading it isn’t necessary. But you’ll probably want to read it after reading this novel — especially the newly available translation by Henry Wadsworth Longfellow, which has been out of print for over 40 years. Pearl’s novel revived interest in the translation and influenced its reissue. Pearl must have felt much like Oliver Wendell Holmes, a character in this novel felt when he wrote “Old Ironsides,” which culminated in the rescue of the U.S.S. Constitution from the scrapyard.

The setting of Pearl’s novel is Boston, 1865. The novel centers around American Romantic poets known commonly as the “Fireside Poets” — Henry Wadsworth Longfellow, Oliver Wendell Holmes, James Russell Lowell, and their publisher J.T. Fields. Longfellow’s wife died in a fire, and Longfellow was badly injured trying to save her. He embarks on a translation of Dante’s Inferno in order to occupy his mind. His friends come over regularly to go over Longfellow’s translation and to discuss and make suggestions for revision. Holmes christens the group “the Dante Club.” A series of bizarre, grisly murders takes place, and the Dante Club come to realize that the murders are punishments based on Dante’s Inferno. Armed with the knowledge that they are among the few Bostonians who know anything about Dante, they decide they must get to the bottom of the mystery. To top it off, they’re worried that Dante’s connection to the murders will be discovered and that Dante’s literary reputation will forever be besmirched by the association.

As an American literature teacher, I found this book fascinating. While the events are fictional, they are rendered with accuracy according to the time and place. It is amazing that so many great literary minds gathered regularly, all in one place at the same time. The novel also sparked my interest in the Fireside Poets. While I can’t claim that I didn’t like them, I will say that I wasn’t much interested in them. With the exception of Longfellow’s elegy for his wife, “A Cross of Snow,” I had not really “gotten into” them before. To be fair, however, I have read very little of their poetry that doesn’t appear in high school literature texts. I find Lowell to be absent from my current text, and the offerings by Holmes and Longfellow are spare. It strikes me that in the not too distant past, Longfellow was the literary celebrity. Everyone liked him. Schoolchildren had to memorize his poetry. To my mind, there has to be some reason why America loved Longfellow so much — indeed, why they loved the Fireside Poets so much that they read their poetry by the fireside (hence their nickname). I think part of Pearl’s goal is to show us that — to ask the reader not just to be curious about Dante, but about these American poets, too.

This book would be ideal for book clubs, being essentially about a book club itself. I found much to like in the characters, and particularly enjoyed Oliver Wendell Holmes. James Russell Lowell reminded me a bit of Steve, actually. This book is the literary thriller that The Da Vinci Code could have been in the hands of an abler writer who actually did his research. I was transported back to Boston in 1865, and I thoroughly enjoyed the trip.

Related posts:

Lolita

If at times Lolita is difficult to wade through, I suppose the reader can chalk that up to the narrator’s admitted psychiatric problems. This book was hard to finish on many levels. First of all, the language itself is dense and beautiful, but requires the constant attention of the reader. I was unable to simply flip through pages, and I often had to go back and re-read things I’d missed. I wish I had a footnoted copy of this book in order to translate all the French I’ve forgotten since high school, as Humbert was so fond of throwing French speech into the narrative. Second, the narrator is absolutely despicable and reprehensible. I have to say that anyone who uses the term “Lolita” to refer to a sexually-aggressive female adolescent probably has not read this book. It is clear that poor Lolita is very much a victim of Humbert Humbert — a point made clear even though it is told only through his point of view. He is an unreliable narrator. His language, his intelligence are meant to beautify his actions and evoke sympathy from the reader, and a quick glance at several Amazon reviews for this book demonstrate that many readers do fall for his story. Humbert Humbert is a creepy pedophile, even if he is gifted with language. He admits to hanging out in places where he is likely to see girls in his target “attraction range,” which is a trait common to pedophiles. He is unattracted to girls or women of any other age range.

Interestingly, Nabokov’s allusions to Edgar Allan Poe’s work really made me see Poe in a new light — a sort of Humbert Humbert, if you will. As an American Literature teacher, I know Poe married his pubescent cousin. I always thought it was weird. After reading this novel, I see it as weird on a whole new level. Humbert excuses his lust for Lolita through allusions to other times, when grown men took child brides. I had always excused Poe’s behavior that way, but I find now that I don’t. Poe’s behavior was pedophiliac. Humbert christens his first love Annabel Leigh (a clear reference to Poe’s poem “Annabel Lee”). I do think a familiarity with Poe is helpful to readers of this novel.

I think this novel is open to both a literal and symbolic interpretation, which is one of the reasons it was stimulating intellectually. Humbert represents Europe — jaded, cynical, refined, intelligent, formal, but also corrupt. Lolita, on the other hand, represents America — young, uncouth, unrefined, naive. America raped and corrupted by the Old World. I think that it is an interesting way to look at the novel, and it works. As Nabokov emigrated to America, I have to wonder if the clash in cultures he experienced didn’t contribute to some of the ideas expressed in the novel.

I am glad I read this book. In a way, I feel like an initiate into a special literature club. It was really hard, though, and I wanted to smack the narrator constantly. He’s very clever, but he’s evil. I argue with the notion that this is an erotic novel. Humbert’s pedophilia is anything but erotic. I don’t see how readers could walk away from this book and feel that Nabokov was endorsing the idea that a grown man and a girl child can have a normal sexual relationship. In other words, Nabokov does not glamorize pedophilia or make it seem in any way romantic — quite the reverse. I am, however, no longer surprised that it is controversial — it astonishes me that Nabokov found a publisher for such fare in the 1950’s. The novel is beautifully written, and even funny in places, but ultimately, it is so sad — even Humbert eventually acknowledges that he ruined Lolita’s life. I think Lolita is a very good study of the mindset of a pedophile, and I shouldn’t be too surprised to learn that psychologists might study it for that reason.

Related posts:

Birthday Books are Here!

I got my birthday books today. There is really nothing like brand new books, with their crisp white pages.

I have to hurry up and finish Lolita so I can read one of my new books. Which one?

Incidentally, if you heard a blurb about my school on the news, you were not hearing things. We were indeed featured on Neal Boortz’s talk show among other news outlets due to a recent brush with Fulton County Schools and eminent domain. Read about it at my education blog (“Groundbreaking” and “Eminent Domain”).

Related posts:

Birthday Books

My mother sent me what is possibly the best present I could receive for my birthday (which is tomorrow) — a Barnes and Noble gift card. I decided to spend it shopping online, because the selection is greater than at the local store, and shipping over $25 is free.

What did I get?

Related posts:

Blackbird House

Alice Hoffman’s book Blackbird House is subtitled “A Novel,” but it really isn’t. It is more accurately described as a series of vignettes, as the chapters do not feel complete enough to even be called short stories. Blackbird House, set on Cape Cod, takes place at different times between the pre-Revolutionary period to the present, tracing the stories of various owners of the home across over 200 years. San Francisco Chronicle reviewer Irene Wanner accurately described Hoffman’s narrative:

For the most part, these episodes operate without the formal short-fiction structure of conflict, climax and resolution; the book isn’t a story collection. Neither is it a traditional novel centered on a main character’s problem. Instead, setting and time serve as the book’s linking device.

I thought the idea was very intriguing, which is what caused me to purchase the book. In execution, it doesn’t work, largely because just as the reader gets to know the characters, the narrative moves on to the next story, most often introducing new characters with new stories. The reader never seems to find out the endings of any of the stories that Hoffman starts.

Hoffman weaves her narrative together with several symbols — the color red, the white blackbird, the red pear tree, and the sweet peas, most of which make an appearance in each story. I started to dread the sight of that white blackbird. In the apt words of Houston Chronicle writer Sharan McBride:

The trouble with Hoffman’s linked narrative is that tragedy and losses that seem moving and affecting early in the book begin to feel manipulative and programmed by the 12th story. And when a white blackbird appears or someone smells the wild sweet peas in the field, you know a loved one is going to get whacked as surely as you do when the camera looks up into the cold eyes of Tony Soprano.

There is too much sadness and grief, and perhaps because the reader never gets the whole story in any one of the vignettes, it is easy to wonder what purpose there is in so much tragedy. I think I just wanted more from this book, as a reader, than it felt like it was willing to give. Perhaps that was Hoffman’s goal. In the end, it seemed that the only permanent aspect of life was the house, which outlived each of her occupants, and was ultimately more interesting than all of them.

Related posts:

Currently Reading

You may or may not have noticed that I disabled the section in the sidebar to the right labeled “Currently Reading” when I upgraded to MT 3.17, because the plugin didn’t appear to work correctly anymore. Now that I have upgraded to 3.2, I was able to also upgrade to Media Manager, which replaces the older Book Queue Too.

Media Manager is really cool! It automatically detected all the books I had in my previous book queue. It is much easier to use than its predecessor, as well. So, for those of you who care to know, you can once again see what I’m reading. I even moved the “Currently Reading” section up so it’s more visible — just below the calendar.

A list of things I like about MT 3.2:

  • The cool, easy to navigate interface
  • The plugins bundled with the release
  • The ease of assigning entries to multiple categories
  • Ease of navigation
  • Easier and better comment and trackback management
  • Unlimited blogs no matter which license — not that they stopped one from creating more than the allotted number of blogs before, but now one can do so… um… legally
  • System Overview for Evil Site Overladies (isn’t that the feminine form of Overlord?)

Related posts: