The Gutenberg Bible Turns 554

Share

Gutenberg BibleDid you know that it was today in 1456 that the printing of the Gutenberg Bible was completed? It was the first major book printed using the movable type printing press. Twenty-one complete copies survive, but other incomplete copies remain. Font nerds might be interested to know that Gutenberg used typefaces called Textualis and Schwabacher. Textualis is sometimes just called Gothic now. The columns were also justified, which you can see from the photograph. Of course, justified columns are still used today in books and newspapers. It was an instant bestseller, selling out of its initial print run of 180 copies. Interestingly, many buyers purchased the Bibles in order to donate them to religious institutions. I’m sure they thought that would be a check in the “nice” column for when they met St. Peter at the pearly gates. One of my own ancestors, David Kennedy, appears to have donated a Bible (not a Gutenberg, of course) to his church with a similar motivation. Germany possesses the most remaining copies at 12, but you can find 11 copies in the United States and 8 in the United Kingdom. The Library of Congress, Pierpont Morgan Library, Yale, Harvard, and the University of Texas at Austin have complete copies. I might have guessed Harvard and Yale would have the kind of endowments necessary to own a complete Gutenberg Bible, but I was surprised at UT Austin. They apparently acquired their Gutenberg in 1978 from the Carl H. Pforzheimer Foundation. The first volume has been illuminated by a former owner about which we know nothing. It also bears annotations that indicate it has been owned and loved. I adore the fact that some annotations are corrections. I correct errors in books sometimes, too.

The Hunger GamesIn completely unrelated news, I am putting The Lost Memoirs of Jane Austen on hold to read The Hunger Games. Not one person I know has had anything less than absolute and unequivocal praise for Suzanne Collins’s trilogy. I need to see what the fuss is all about.

JulietAlso, Amazon sent me an email today suggesting I might be interested in Juliet by Anne Fortier, and I am. Check out the Publisher’s Weekly blurb:

Fortier bobs and weaves between Shakespearean tragedy and popular romance for a high-flying debut in which American Julie Jacobs travels to Siena in search of her Italian heritage—and possibly an inheritance—only to discover she is descended from 14th-century Giulietta Tomei, whose love for Romeo defied their feuding families and inspired Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet. Julie’s hunt leads her to the families’ descendants, still living in Siena, still feuding, and still struggling under the curse of the friar who wished a plague on both their houses. Julie’s unraveling of the past is assisted by a Felliniesque contessa and the contessa’s handsome nephew, and complicated by mobsters, police, and a mysterious motorcyclist. To understand what happened centuries ago, in the previous generation, and all around her, Julie relies on relics: a painting, a journal, a dagger, a ring. Readers enjoy the additional benefit of antique texts alternating with contemporary narratives, written in the language of modern romance and enlivened by brisk storytelling. Fortier navigates around false clues and twists, resulting in a dense, heavily plotted love story that reads like a Da Vinci Code for the smart modern woman.

So who took liberties? Shakespeare or Fortier? It was no friar who wished a plague on both house (it was Mercutio). How did Juliet have descendants? And why Siena instead of fair Verona? Still, I am intrigued. And it was probably Shakespeare.

Photo credit Kevin Eng.


Share

Booking Through Thursday on a Saturday

Share

Maybe once I get back into the swing of things at school—this was our first week back—I’ll abide by the posting schedule I set for myself. What I don’t want to do is let my blogs go weeks or even a month or more with no posts, like I have done in the past. I didn’t get my Booking Through Thursday post up on Thursday, and indeed, I didn’t even look at the prompt until today, but it is one that I liked and want to answer even if I’m late.

1. Favorite childhood book?
Rascal by Sterling North. I really wanted a raccoon.

2. What are you reading right now?
The House of Seven Gables by Nathaniel Hawthorne, Great Expectations by Charles Dickens (DailyLit), and The Lost Memoirs of Jane Austen by Syrie James.

3. What books do you have on request at the library?
None right now. I kind of owe them some overdue book fees, and I have been avoiding them until I can get myself together enough to pay.

4. Bad book habit?
Hmm… maybe that I don’t use the library as much as I should and wind up spending too much money on books. To my credit, I do try to save up for when I receive my Amazon Associate payments.

5. What do you currently have checked out at the library?
Well, I don’t have anything checked out, but my kids have their own cards, and none of them owe the library money, so I took Maggie to the library and we checked out a bunch of books about the Salem witch trials as well as some books about art for Dylan and some Junie B. Jones books and Amber Brown is Not a Crayon by Paula Danziger.

6. Do you have an e-reader?
Yes, I love my Kindle very much.

7. Do you prefer to read one book at a time, or several at once?
I usually have three going at once: one on DailyLit and two others so I can pick between them based on which one I feel like reading. I don’t know if I could juggle more than that.

8. Have your reading habits changed since starting a blog?
Yes. I know I read more because I’m conscious of wanting to update with my reviews. In terms of what I read, probably not a lot except that sometimes I will choose a book because of other book bloggers’ reviews when I might not otherwise have heard of the book or been interested in it. I also never used to read more than one book at at time.

9. Least favorite book you read this year (so far?)
Charity Girl by Georgette Heyer or perhaps Crime and Punishment by Fyodor Dostoyevsky. No, Charity Girl.

10. Favorite book you’ve read this year?
Hard to pick, but I loved A Farewell to Arms by Ernest Hemingway, The Help by Kathryn Stockton, and The Map of True Places by Brunonia Barry.

11. How often do you read out of your comfort zone?
Not often. Someone on Goodreads said to me that I “have an amazing ability to choose to read books that you’ll love.” I am pretty sure it was a dig because I often rate books 4 or 5 stars. I just don’t pick too many books that I wind up feeling like I was sort of ambivalent about or don’t enjoy very often. Sometimes I do, but for the most part, my gut tells me I will either like it or not, and I’m right about it a lot of the time. So I tend to stick with what I like.

12. What is your reading comfort zone?
Now there’s the rub. My comfort zone is pretty darned big. I like lots of genres. I like classics, contemporary fiction, fantasy (sometimes), nonfiction, poetry, literary fiction, children’s and YA, and historical fiction. I don’t tend to like mysteries as much, and I’m not sure why. I love Sherlock Holmes stories. I just don’t think to read them. I might actually like them more if I tried them. I don’t really go in for sci-fi much, though I am a huge Star Trek and Star Wars fan, so you’d think I would. I don’t really like some kinds of fantasy. I have discovered over time I have to be careful what I select in that genre. I don’t care for romance novels. I have tried those in the past, and I think writers like Nora Roberts are better than some others in that genre, but I am not crazy about them in general.

13. Can you read on the bus?
Yes. It doesn’t bother me to read on the bus. I do have more trouble reading in the car.

14. Favorite place to read?
At home in bed. I like to curl up.

15. What is your policy on book lending?
I lend books. Sometimes they don’t come home again, but most of the time they do. I prefer to share and expose people to a good book than worry about not getting books back.

16. Do you ever dog-ear books?
Never! That’s awful!

17. Do you ever write in the margins of your books?
Yes, if they’re professional reading or textbooks. Not really novels. However, I do annotate and highlight books on my Kindle because it doesn’t feel like I’m ruining them.

18.  Not even with text books?
I actually mark up professional reading books more. I especially like it when they have wide margins so I can write in them. I wrote all over Understanding by Design by Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe.

19. What is your favorite language to read in?
I can only read in one language, so I’m going to have to say English.

20. What makes you love a book?
Characters that are so real and so well-developed and so likable that I wish I knew them in real life.

21. What will inspire you to recommend a book?
Great characters, great language, thinking that the person would enjoy it.

22. Favorite genre?
Hard to pick. I’m not sure I really have one, but maybe historical fiction.

23. Genre you rarely read (but wish you did?)
I should probably give mysteries more of a go.

Favorite biography?
Georgiana, Duchess of Devonshire by Amanda Foreman.

25. Have you ever read a self-help book?
Oh, I forgot this was a genre when I was answering the questions earlier. I have read one. Do I read them regularly? No.

26. Favorite cookbook?
The Better Homes and Gardens New Cook Book: Celebrating the Promise Limited Edition (proceeds go to breast cancer research and familiar check cover is pink and white instead of red and white). I love everything about it: the ring binding, which makes it stay open when I’m cooking; the great recipes for buttermilk-brined fried chicken, pepper-lime chicken, French onion soup, and so many others; the help sections.

27. Most inspirational book you’ve read this year (fiction or non-fiction)?
The Help.

28. Favorite reading snack?

Anything! Chips, popcorn, fruit, whatever. I’m not picky.

29. Name a case in which hype ruined your reading experience.
Hmm… the only thing I can think of that comes close to answering the question is The Da Vinci Code or perhaps The Rule of Four. I certainly turned the pages with The Da Vinci Code, but it got so much press, and it ultimately wasn’t that well written, and then I discovered how shoddy the research upon which Dan Brown based his book was (Holy Blood, Holy Grail), and it became kind of a frustration of mine that the book remained so popular. I never touched another of his books despite the fact that the students are continually recommending Angels and Demons to me. With The Rule of Four, it was more like the book got attention for being like The Da Vinci Code and then when I read it, I was really disappointed. I felt the authors’ youth showed, and ultimately, it just didn’t do anything for me.

30. How often do you agree with critics about a book?
I actually don’t read a lot of critics, so I’m not sure. I would tend to say that I probably don’t agree with them a whole lot because I tend to give way too many good reviews.

31. How do you feel about giving bad/negative reviews?
I have mixed feelings. For instance, if someone recommended a book, and I didn’t like it, I feel bad. That’s how I felt after The Meaning of Night and Charity Girl. Because I like the people who recommended it, I really want to like the book. If I don’t have that sort of emotional investment, however, I don’t feel bothered at all.

32. If you could read in a foreign language, which language would you chose?
I think I would like to read in Hebrew because there is so much of it around my school, and it would be nice to know what some of it says. Sometimes I can pick out enough French or Spanish to get by, but not Hebrew.

33. Most intimidating book you’ve ever read?
Well, just because of when I read it, it was Gone with the Wind. I read it in 7th grade. It was my first grown up book. It was intimidating at over 1,000 pages in paperback. I’d never read anything that long. It took me two weeks at a time when other books usually took a couple of days. It was also two weeks of reading whenever I could: at school waiting for class to start, at lunch, at home, in bed, on the school bus, etc. I was really proud when I finished because it was so long and it was considered an adult book.

34. Most intimidating book you’re too nervous to begin?
It’s going to have to be something like War and Peace or Proust. I’ll probably never read books like that. Although, I did read Moby Dick, and I was nervous about that one.

35. Favorite Poet?
Percy Bysshe Shelley.

36. How many books do you usually have checked out of the library at any given time?
Depends on whether I owe them money. I try to limit myself to one or two because I often need more time than typical checkouts and sometimes even renewals give me to read. I feel too much pressure.

37. How often have you returned book to the library unread?
I can’t say the exact number, but I am sure I’ve done it.

38. Favorite fictional character?
Severus Snape. Although I love Una Spenser from Ahab’s Wife a great deal.

39. Favorite fictional villain?
Darth Vader, though he’s not really from books. The best villain in books is probably Bellatrix Lestrange. I did name my cat after her. She’s more interesting to me than Voldemort, who is kind of one-dimensional.

40. Books I’m most likely to bring on vacation?
I brought my Kindle so I didn’t have to narrow anything down last time. Light fare that I don’t have to concentrate on too much.

41. The longest I’ve gone without reading.
Can’t be more than a few weeks because it makes me go crazy.

42. Name a book that you could/would not finish.
John Berendt’s book about Venice: The City of Falling Angels. I loved Midnight in the Garden of Good and Evil. I’ve read that one a couple of times at least. I just couldn’t get interested in City of Falling Angels.

43. What distracts you easily when you’re reading?
My kids and my husband. The television.

44. Favorite film adaptation of a novel?
Hmm. Even though I do have my problems with them, the Harry Potter films.

45. Most disappointing film adaptation?
Their Eyes Were Watching God. I think the acting was fine, but they made some pretty unnecessary changes. Why, for instance, did they need to underscore the title so much by having Janie say it so often? She never says it in the book. It comes in when the hurricane hits and the narrator says it. Also, Halle Berry, who is gorgeous I love her, was not Janie. Michael Ealy was, however, Tea Cake. The book is just so lyrical and beautiful, and you can’t capture that kind of beauty or lyricism on film all the time. Although I felt like Brokeback Mountain did, so it’s possible. I don’t know why they couldn’t do it better justice, but they didn’t.

46. The most money I’ve ever spent in the bookstore at one time?
Oh, I’m sure it was insane, but probably not more than about $100.

47. How often do you skim a book before reading it?
I do that sometimes, but not a lot.

48. What would cause you to stop reading a book half-way through?
Half-way is pretty far for me to go and stop. It would have to be pretty bad. I can’t think of anything. I’d probably plow through at half-way.

49. Do you like to keep your books organized?
Ha ha! Organized? They’re stuffed willy nilly on shelves in no order at all. On my Kindle, however, they’re in nice, neat folders.

50. Do you prefer to keep books or give them away once you’ve read them?
Keep them. I don’t know why. I don’t re-read too many of them.

51. Are there any books you’ve been avoiding?
Maybe the Stieg Larsson books because I’m just not sure I’d like them.

52. Name a book that made you angry.
Memnoch the Devil when Lestat drank blood from Jesus’s neck. I have a high tolerance for sacrilege, but I actually threw that book against the wall, sulked for a while, picked it up, and finished it, and really, really hated it. I gave her a couple of chances after that—read Merrick, tried to read but didn’t finish Blackwood Farm or Blood and Gold, but honestly didn’t really like a book after The Tale of the Body Thief, so I’ve given up on Anne Rice.

53. A book you didn’t expect to like but did?
The Sun Also Rises. I had little experience with Hemingway when I was assigned this book in college, but I found I really did like it quite a lot. I wasn’t sure I’d enjoy it at all when it was assigned.

54. A book that you expected to like but didn’t?
The most recent one was The Meaning of Night by Michael Cox. It honestly has a lot of the ingredients I like in a book: a bit of mystery, a Victorian setting. Just didn’t gel for me.

55. Favorite guilt-free, pleasure reading?
I have given myself permission not to feel guilty for enjoying books. Life’s too short.

I would actually love to see your answers to these questions, too, so consider yourself tagged even if you don’t do Booking Through Thursday.


Share
Katherine Howe and Me

Re-Reading The Physick Book of Deliverance Dane

Share

Katherine Howe and MeAfter my trip to Salem in July, I have been reading books set there, and I just finished a re-read of The Physick Book of Deliverance Dane. I found the book as enjoyable the second time as I did the first. I’d really like to read some more books set in Salem, but aside from The House of Seven Gables, I don’t have any on hand. I decided to go forward with the Everything Austen Challenge and read Syrie James’s The Lost Memoirs of Jane Austen. I’m looking forward to reading her newest book, Dracula, My Love. Anyone reading that one?

My students seemed interested to hear about my trip to Salem. Many of them had read The Crucible last year, and they remembered the characters. I told them I had seen Judge Hathorne’s grave and all the memorials for each of the people who were executed. I think I’ll have a lot of fun teaching The Crucible this year.

I think I’ll try to start both The House of Seven Gables and The Lost Memoirs of Jane Austen tonight.


Share

Reading Update: August 15, 2010

Share

ReadingHello all. I have been lax about my blogging schedule this week as I returned to work for pre-planning. The first day of school is tomorrow. The day I stop being excited and nervous about the first day is probably the day I should retire. We have had intermittent Internet connection problems here at the Huff casa, and I’m pretty sure it’s either our cable company or our cable modem, but I have to grab time to do my work and to write here and elsewhere when it’s available.

I’m still reading The Physick Book of Deliverance Dane by Katherine Howe, but I’m approaching the end. I might finish it today if I get the chance to sit down and read, but I also have some planning to do for school, so I’m not sure. I’m looking for good witchy book recommendations if you have any.

I finished A Farewell to Arms yesterday. Shelfari tells me that was my 23rd book this year, which makes me really happy because I only read 23 total for the entire year of 2009. It looks like 2010 should be better. My review of Georgette Heyer’s Regency romance Charity Girl will be up at Austenprose toward the end of August, and once it appears, I’ll review it here, too.

I have had a few friends ask me about reading because I use Goodreads to post updates, and those updates appear on both Twitter and Facebook. One friend asked me how many books I usually read at the same time. I usually have three going. I have one on the Kindle, one on DailyLit, and one other book either on the Kindle or paperback/hardcover. I like to have choices so that if I’m feeling like switching things up, I can. I read the DailyLit selection each day whenever I can get the chance. The other two, I switch between. I did not used to be able to read more than one book at a time. I’m not sure why that changed. I have to say I feel tremendous pressure to read as many books as I can because I’m conscious I have a limited amount of time on earth. It’s probably morbid thinking, but it compels me to keep going.

I picked up The House of Seven Gables by Nathaniel Hawthorne on my Kindle. I haven’t quite started it yet.

So what are you reading?

photo credit: Wiertz Sébastien


Share

A Farewell to Arms

Share

A Farewell To ArmsWe were having some trouble with our Internet connection this morning. Since it looked like it was going to be a long-standing issue, perhaps even stretching into the beginning of the week (quelle horreur!), I decided to try to finish A Farewell to Arms. I am teaching it for the first time starting next week, and I wanted to be ready. I have not read a lot of Hemingway’s novels. I have never read The Old Man and the Sea or For Whom the Bell Tolls, but I have read and loved The Sun Also Rises. I have read and loved many of his short stories.

If you haven’t read A Farewell to Arms, parts of this review are really spoilery. I had the end spoiled for me long ago, and it didn’t diminish my enjoyment of the book one whit, but if your mileage varies on that score, then consider yourself forewarned.

Continue reading “A Farewell to Arms”


Share

Battle of Maldon

Share

Statue of Brythnoth, Earl of EssexHave you ever heard of the Battle of Maldon? It happened on this date in 991 when Vikings invaded Essex, inspiring an Old English poem that influenced the writing of J.R.R. Tolkien.

August 12 marks the birthday of the former British poet laureate Robert Southey 1in 1774. I always remember an Introduction to Literature professor I had freshman year of college tried to tell us Southey was the father of Frankenstein novelist Mary Shelley. Nope. William Godwin was. August 12 also marks the anniversary of the deaths of poets William Blake in 1837 and James Russell Lowell in 1891 as well as the death of Thomas Mann in 1955 and Ian Fleming in 1964.

August 13 marks the anniversary of the death of H. G. Wells in 1946.

August 14 is the birthday of American romance novelist Danielle Steele.

August 15 marks the anniversary of the death of Duncan at the hand of Macbeth and Macbeth himself 17 years later at the hands of Malcolm (Máel Coluim mac Donnchada). Shakespeare telescopes these events in his play Macbeth. Sir Walter Scott was also born on that date in 1771 and Stieg Larsson in 1954.

August 16 marks the birthday of T. E. Lawrence in 1888, Georgette Heyer in 1902, and Charles Bukowski in 1920. British poet Andrew Marvell died on August 16 in 17678. August 16 also marks the anniversary of the date in 1949 when Gone With the Wind novelist Margaret Mitchell died after injuries suffered when she was hit by a car on Peachtree Street.


Share

Reading Update: August 8, 2010

Share

HatsI’m still reading books set in Salem. After finishing Brunonia Barry’s The Map of True Places and The Lace Reader, I returned to Katherine Howe’s The Physick Book of Deliverance Dane, although this book is set more in Marblehead than Salem, it does have some scenes in Salem. I think my favorite thing about Salem was just walking around and looking at everything. It truly is a unique town, and I do hope I have the opportunity to go back.

In addition to The Physick Book of Deliverance Dane, I’ve begun a new DailyLit selection: Charles Dickens’s Great Expectations. I haven’t read this one. I know, I know. Well, it sure starts off with a bang! Dickens was a master of characterization.

I am still reading just finished Charity Girl. I believe I’ll be finished with that one in a day or two, but my review will not appear here until the day it is published at Austenprose.

I am now about halfway through A Farewell to Arms. At this point, Catherine is pregnant, and Henry is going back to the front. I am wondering what is going to happen. I know the ending of this book. Years of being an English teacher have spoiled that plot, but I still wonder how we will get from here to there, and I wonder what will happen in between. I also found myself looking up “jaundice” on Wikipedia to see if it can be caused by alcoholism, and it looks like it can. Hemingway’s economy with words is beautiful in its simplicity. He still manages to capture so much with so little.

I’ve been trying to decide what I should read next. I’m still on this Salem kick, so I might read The Heretic’s Daughter, but I think I will scout around. Has anyone read Practical Magic by Alice Hoffman? I was going to swear off Hoffman after her Twitter rant last year, but this book looks interesting to me.

On a side note, Apture, the tool I use to create links on this site, appears to be broken at the moment, so the links might not pop up as enhanced links the way they usually do. And this post took twice as long to write as it would have with Apture. Hope they fix it soon!

photo credit: danahuff


Share
Goodreads and Shelfari

Goodreads and Shelfari

Share

Goodreads and ShelfariDo you use Goodreads or Shelfari? Or both? I use both services. Each has features I like, but neither one does everything I want a reading social network to do.

Sharing Progress

Goodreads gives readers the option to share their progress through status updates either with page numbers or percentage read, which is great if you’re reading on an e-reader. I really like this feature. I think Shelfari should add it. Both sites do a great job cataloging multiple versions of books so that you can add the version you are reading to ensure the descriptions, page counts, etc. all match your particular copy.

Linked to Social Networks

Goodreads also allows users to share updates via Twitter and Facebook, which is a nice feature. Facebook can be integrated nicely with Goodreads. One of my Facebook friends told me he joined Goodreads because of seeing my updates on Facebook. My status updates show up on Twitter, and occasionally, people who follow me on Twitter ask me about what I’m reading, so the integration is a nice feature. Shelfari isn’t linked up with social networks. I think it would be a good feature for Shelfari to add.

Look and Feel

Shelfari’s site and bookshelves are beautiful. Shelfari allows users to select a material out of which to construct their shelves (wood or metal, etc.). Book covers are displayed on the shelves in a way Apple’s iBooks emulated for their app. Shelfari also makes beautiful shelf widgets for users to put on their blogs. In terms of look and feel, Shelfari scores big marks over Goodreads. I’d like to see Goodreads beautify their look and feel, too, but I suspect it would involve a major overhaul, and the site is perfectly functional as it is.

Re-Reading Books

Shelfari has much better support for re-readers than Goodreads. On Goodreads, you can mark a book as “Read” or “Currently Reading,” but not both. Shelfari allows for those users who re-read to mark a book as both. It would be a simple feature for Goodreads to implement, I should think, as it would mean changing the radio buttons they currently use to check boxes that allow for multiple selections. In addition, Shelfari allows users to add new “finished” dates each time a reader finishes a book. If a user has read a book three times, he or she can add three different finished dates. Goodreads allows only one, and you need to either keep the first finished date, or change it to a new one. Again, I think this is a feature that Goodreads could easily add.

Community

I like the community at Goodreads. They are serious readers. If you want the true skinny on a book, their reviews are often more helpful than Amazon’s. Users can also add trivia questions and join groups. I am a member of several groups on both Shelfari and Goodreads, but not too active. I think Shelfari could add some features to foster a livelier community. I think starting with social network integration would be a good idea, but further than that, I like the idea that users can add quotes and trivia to Goodreads. If Shelfari added these features, they might keep users on the site longer. Both Goodreads and Shelfari allow users to add content to book descriptions and change book information. On Goodreads, you need to apply to become a librarian. I haven’t noticed any egregious vandalism of books on the more open Shelfari, but perhaps it’s not a terrible idea to set some kind of bar. Goodreads just asks that users who want to become librarians have 50 books on their profile. It’s a good way of keeping occasional users or non-committed users from making random changes they shouldn’t.

Book Tallies

Goodreads and Shelfari both tally your total number of books, but Shelfari has a nice feature that you see on your home page when you’re logged in: the total number of books you’ve read this year. I love this feature. I try to read more books each year, and Shelfari totals the number you’ve read and compares to your reading during the previous year. If you have not read as many, it will tell you you’re behind your pace. If you’ve read more, it tells you you’re ahead of your pace. It’s a nice little pat on the back to log in and see I’ve nearly reached the total number of books I read last year, and it’s only August. I think Goodreads could add this feature, too.

Reviews

Both sites allow users to post reviews, but I like that Goodreads allows HTML in their reviews because I simply link back to my reviews here on this blog. As an English teacher, I appreciate being able to italicize titles using HTML, too. I think Shelfari should add the ability to use HTML in reviews. I don’t like leaving a blank review on Shelfari, so I usually copy and paste my reviews into their review space. But I often have links and other HTML in my posts that does not transfer. Both sites also allow you to assign starred ratings to books, but neither has 1/2 stars. The plugin I use to rate books here on this site allows for 1/2 stars, and I like that. Sometimes a book is not a 3 or 4. It’s a 3.5. It would be nice for Goodreads and Shelfari to give wishy-washy reviewers like me who can’t come down on a 3 or 4 the option of a 3.5.

The Bottom Line

Both sites have some great features, but each of them could be much better with a few simple changes. I have an account with LibraryThing, but I don’t use it. I don’t agree with their restriction of 200 books for free accounts. When Shelfari and Goodreads have excellent features for free, it seems silly to pay for LibraryThing. I don’t really understand Shelfari’s “Should I Read X?” feature. I should think users should be able to read reviews and figure out for themselves if they should read a book. It seems superfluous to me. Goodreads has a lot of authors on board, and it can be fun to interact with them. I’ve even seen Lev Grossman reply to reviews of his work.

What do you think? Do you use Goodreads, Shelfari, or even LibraryThing? If so, what features do you wish they had? Oh, and feel free to “friend” me on Goodreads or Shelfari.


Share

The Lace Reader: A Re-Read

Share

I first read Brunonia Barry’s debut novel The Lace Reader right before it was published as an advanced reader copy. You can read my review here. I decided to re-read the novel after my trip to Salem. I think Barry’s Map of True Places captures the character of Salem perhaps more clearly than Barry’s first novel, but I think that The Map of True Places is also more about Salem than The Lace Reader. It’s strange, but this time reading, I did see some elements of a feminine hero’s journey that I didn’t pick up on before. Before I go on, I should warn you that I won’t divulge the big reveal at the end of the book, but the remainder of this review might be a bit spoilery.

Katherine Howe, writer of The Physick Book of Deliverance Dane, has said that historically dogs have been considered witches’ familiars in greater numbers than cats, who have the association with witchcraft today. She gave her Connie a little dog named Arlo in her book. I wondered as I read about all the dogs on Yellow Dog Island, who seemed to be able to know what Towner wanted and would listen to her, especially in one crucial scene in the end. Did Barry intend to hearken back to the idea of dogs as familiars, or was it a coincidental choice? I myself would consider Towner, May, and Eva to be witches in a sense, though they don’t explicitly embrace that notion themselves in the same way that Ann Chase does.

One of the elements Joseph Campbell describes as an aspect of many hero’s journeys is the rebirth in the forest or the cave. For example, in Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, Harry walks into the Forbidden Forest to face Voldemort, fully believing he will die. Instead, the Horcrux inside him is destroyed, and he is, in a sense, reborn. In The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, Huck fakes his own death to escape from Pap. He emerges from the cave on the island a new person, so to speak. I saw a similar rebirth in The Lace Reader. Toward the end, when Towner is trying to rescue Angela from Cal’s followers, the two women travel through a secret doorway in Eva’s basement that leads to a tunnel. Because the tide is in, the water partially fills the tunnel, and the women will have to swim in order to escape because Cal’s followers have set fire to Eva’s house behind them. Towner takes Angela by the hair and instructs her to go limp so that she can help both of them swim to the end of the tunnel. They emerge in Eva’s boathouse at the other end. In a way, this seemed to me to be a feminization of the emergence from the cave in that the water surrounded the women. It actually made me think it might be a metaphor for the birth canal. After that moment, both women are in a sense reborn. I wondered if that metaphor had occurred to Barry, if she had been aiming for it. By the way, I subscribe to the belief that just because a writer didn’t intentionally mean to create a symbol or metaphor, it doesn’t mean it’s not there. Reading is a creative act, and we bring our thoughts and experiences to reading. If we see a symbol there, then as far as I’m concerned, it’s there. Tolkien is famous, for example, for hating allegory. Yet The Lord of the Rings, and especially The Silmarillion can be read as biblical allegory. I actually like Jasper Fforde’s explanation: he says a book only belongs to an author as long as no one else has read it. After that, it belongs to the reader, too, and the creative act of reading allows for readers to interpret books in ways that authors might not have considered. And they’re right, too.

The Lace Reader is more intriguing on a re-read because knowing the big reveal at the end enabled me to read the book with a different eye. I caught many more of Barry’s hints regarding what might be going on in Towner’s psyche than I did when I read it the first time. Unreliable narrators are difficult because I think as readers we are trained to trust the person telling the story, and some people don’t like this book because they feel betrayed by the narrator. However, Barry has not betrayed anyone. It would take a more astute reader than I to pick up on all the clues on a first read, but she does plant clues, and in the end, the big reveal makes sense given what the reader knows about Towner and how other characters react to her. Re-reading revealed much more starkly to me the ways in which Barry takes pains not to cheat the reader, but I think some of the negative comments I’ve seen about this book centered around not feeling prepared for that ending, and on a re-read, I didn’t think it is a fair criticism. I admit to being surprised by the ending the first time, but it isn’t completely out of the blue, and it makes sense in the story. And as I said in my last review, readers would do well to take Towner at her word in the first few sentences. She is telling the truth, there.

I think Barry is an interesting writer. She has a great knack for evoking a place, turning that place into a character in its own right. Her secondary characters like Eva, Ann Chase, who appears in both of her novels, and Melville, Finch, and Jessina in The Map of True Places are well-drawn and fun to read. In all, I think The Map of True Places is a stronger book, and I think those who didn’t enjoy The Lace Reader precisely for the reasons I discussed will like it better, but I thoroughly enjoyed both books. I thought this interview, in which Barry examines the novel herself with a critical eye, was illuminating.

Both times I have read this book, I’ve finished wanting know how to make lace. I am looking forward to whatever Brunonia Barry writes next. I find her writing inspiring in that I would like to be able to write about place and create such interesting characters in the same way that she does.

My rating is still the same.

Rating: ★★★★★

Full disclosure: I received this book originally as an advanced reader copy, and the second copy, the one I re-read, as part of a prize package from William Morrow and Destination Salem. I like the paperback cover better than the hardcover version.


Share

Gulliver’s Travels

Share

Gulliver's TravelsJonathan Swift’s novel Gulliver’s Travels is as excellent a satire today as when it was published in 1726. Lemuel Gulliver is a surgeon with the soul of an explorer. Gulliver’s Travels purports to be the tale of his voyages, including descriptions of the strange peoples and sites he encounters. Most readers are familiar with his iconic adventures in Lilliput, a land populated by beings six inches tall, where Gulliver towers over the inhabitants like a giant. Gulliver is initially mistrusted and even held captive in Lilliput until he enters into the service of the king. Over time, Gulliver learns that Lilliput is at war with neighboring country Blefuscu over which end of the egg it is most proper to break—the little or the big. When Gulliver refuses to help Lilliput fight her enemy Blefuscu, he is charged with treason. He manages to escape and is rescued by a ship and returns home.

It’s not long before he’s at sea again and winds up in the land of Brobdingnag, a land populated by giants. Gulliver now finds himself in a land where he is of Lilliputian size in comparison to the inhabitants. He is cared for by a Brobdingnagian girl and exhibited as a curiosity. This time, his leave-taking is accidental as an eagle snatches the traveling box in which he’s being carried and drops it into the sea, where he is once again rescued.

On his third voyage, Gulliver visits several more interesting countries, including Japan, which I found curious as it’s the only “real” country described in the novel. The flying island of Laputa, with its focus on mathematics and music, was really interesting to me, especially in light of their impracticality. It reminded me a little bit of Donald in Mathmagic Land. You remember seeing it in school?

The final voyage, which Gulliver undertakes after swearing off exploring for good, takes Gulliver to the land of the Houyhnhnms, who are horse-like creatures. Gulliver comes to admire the Houyhnhnms more than people. The people he encounters in the land are course, uncivilized Yahoos. In this final voyage, Gulliver learns to appreciate the Houyhnhnms over his own kind, which he afterward refers to as Yahoos.

I think Lemuel Gulliver is a huge jerk. He abandons his family. His wife was pregnant when he left on his last voyage. When he returns, he rejects his family and prefers to spend time with a pair of horses he has procured. He passes judgment on the people he encounters. I found the Houyhnhnms to be haughty and proud and certainly couldn’t understand Gulliver’s adoration of them. Perhaps it is Swift’s way of asking the reader to think about why they look up to anyone. As usual, Swift’s satire is razor-sharp. I admit some of the book surprised me. Gulliver talks quite a lot about his bodily functions, and I admit I didn’t expect that out of a book written during that time, but I suppose it makes sense given that this is not the prim Victorian period. The book had some enjoyable moments. I liked the parts set in Brobdingnag and Laputa the best. I’m glad I read the book despite finding its protagonist to be hard to sympathize with, but I think a book about Gulliver’s wife would have been interesting, too. I would have kicked his sorry tail out the door, and good riddance. I think one of the chief ironies of the book is that Gulliver criticizes so many of the societies, ultimately idolizing the Houyhnhnms (undeservedly, in my opinion) and despising his own race, without seeing that he is one of the least likable, least worthy, and most fallible of them all. Ultimately, I just like to read about protagonists I can care about more. I found myself hoping Gulliver would suffer harm. A good frying pan over his head and kick in the ass administered by his wife when he showed up after the Houyhnhnms kicked him out would have redeemed the book nicely for me.

I read this novel via DailyLit.

Rating: ★★★½☆
Share